<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Pinwheel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/2009/11/project-pinwheel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/2009/11/project-pinwheel/</link>
	<description>Fuel for Software Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/2009/11/project-pinwheel/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/?p=360#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Sure I will go try this. and let you know what are the things I liked in it the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure I will go try this. and let you know what are the things I liked in it the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don McGreal</title>
		<link>http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/2009/11/project-pinwheel/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Don McGreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/?p=360#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Great game Andre!

Definitely going to try this out.
Do you ever get a group saying that round 2 was more efficient simply because they learned from round 1? I ask because I&#039;ve run into this with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/2009/06/were-having-a-party/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;We&#039;re Having a Party game&lt;/a&gt;. 
A way to get around it is with parallel teams doing the different styles or by having them try to beat their round 2 progress with another round of command-and-control.

Thanks Andre!

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great game Andre!</p>
<p>Definitely going to try this out.<br />
Do you ever get a group saying that round 2 was more efficient simply because they learned from round 1? I ask because I&#8217;ve run into this with the <a href="http://blog.tastycupcakes.com/2009/06/were-having-a-party/" rel="nofollow">We&#8217;re Having a Party game</a>.<br />
A way to get around it is with parallel teams doing the different styles or by having them try to beat their round 2 progress with another round of command-and-control.</p>
<p>Thanks Andre!</p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
